Depois ela vai pro mundo e coitadinha. Nosso melhor quadro pode virar banheiro de cachorro e nosso pior texto pode virar tatuagem nas costas de um desconhecido.
Olha que bacana o que Hugh MacLeod, o autor desse manifesto obrigatório, tem a dizer sobre o assunto:
To me, the interesting thing about art is not the usual “Heroic, absinthe-soaked, vision quest lone individual archetypal artist crap”, but how the art is USED by the person who has it hanging on the wall. What’s it actually there for? Decoration? Showing off? A conversation starter? An ice breaker? A way of telling a story? Something to brighten up the room? A symbol of social status? An expression of individual worldview? An expression of emotion? A totem to remind oneself of something inspirational and/or important? Perhaps a bit of all these?
So I’m seeing two worlds collide here: The internal, solitary part of making the art, and the external social part of how the piece of art is actually used. Art? Used? Is art actually allowed to be “used”? Would the Art Police allow that? Instead of calling them “Patrons”, can we call art buyers “Users” instead? Would you be offended if I called you that? There’s no wrong answer…
Pingback: Ilustrações e o retorno da newsletter | palitos de fósforo